Regulatory execution intelligence™
Institutional intelligence for a world of regulatory complexity.
Flagship engagement · Territorial
Multi-domain regulatory coordination for an institution operating across several jurisdictions and more than one regulatory domain.
Anonymised at the client's instruction · Terms held confidential
Institutional & sovereign-facing work
Recognition & institutional standing
Awarded
EuroHPC — European Commission
Compute support through the EuroHPC AI Factory Playground — LUMI-G.
Awarded
European Commission — Sustainability Policy Practices
Awarded by the European Commission for sustainability policy practices in 2024, delivered with partners, with the founder's leadership recognised for the work.
Confirmed
InvestEU Portal — European Commission
ARETE is listed on the European Commission's InvestEU Portal.
View the InvestEU Portal listingRecognised
Enterprise Insider — Singapore
ARETÉ Strategy AI is part of the Enterprise Insider award for governance and strategic leadership, Singapore.
Client feedback
Client identities are not disclosed on this site. Quotations are attributed by role, and by name only where the client has consented.
Intelligence · Governance · Execution · Evidence
Sources · versions
Register currentESMA guidelines on ESG fund naming
SRC-0114 · v2
EBA guidelines on loan origination
SRC-0128 · v1
DORA RTS on ICT third-party risk
SRC-0131 · v3
Every version is retained with its integrity hash and the date it was read.
Every instrument in force, held with the version that was read.
Exposure · coverage
Read this weekInventory coverage only: an instrument is held here, not asserted to apply.
Where it bites, read against the institution's own footprint.
Execution · ORB-0142
ActiveICT third-party register maintained and reviewed
Ownership, deadline and required evidence, held on the record itself.
Obligations carried to an accountable owner and a deadline.
Evidence · EV-0287
AcceptedOutsourcing policy, approved 2026
DocumentaryAcceptance recorded with the reviewer, the date and the basis it rested on.
Acceptance by a reviewer who is not the submitter.
Illustrative representations of the platform's registers, populated with example records. No institution's records are shown.
The intelligence behind execution
Instruments watched at publication, read into provisions.
Entities, projects and assets read from the register.
Dependencies recorded with their rationale, enforced before change.
A named owner, a deadline and an escalation route, every time.
Accepted by a reviewer who is not the submitter.
Briefs and reporting drawn from the register itself.
The five differentiators
Turning regulatory complexity into strategic visibility, informed decisions and accountable execution.
See beyond regulatory change.
Jurisdictions · sectors · entities · environments
Understand what connects.
Regulations · assets · projects · obligations
Anticipate what could change.
Exposure · cascading effects · scenarios
Know what requires a decision.
Priorities · options · governance pathways
Translate decisions into control.
Ownership · controls · evidence · assurance
From regulatory intelligence to institutional decision and execution control.
The intelligence manufacturing methodology
The execution chain
Select a stage to read what the platform does there, and the record it leaves behind.
Instrument 2026/114 · two jurisdictions · illustrative
A new or amended instrument is detected at the authority's own publication. The source is registered with the version that was read, its integrity hash and the date of retrieval, so nothing downstream rests on a summary that cannot be traced back to the text.
Held in the record
The sequence is illustrative. The instrument shown is constructed to demonstrate the chain and is not a citation of any published instrument.
69 jurisdictions across 4 regions — take one to read it alone
Inventory coverage, not verified coverage. Each register reports its own position.
The cost of manual regulatory execution
The model takes the figures the institution already holds: those performing the work, the instruments under supervision, the interval before a change reaches an accountable owner, and the daily cost of exposure left unresolved. It returns the annual cost of the present position, and what changes when execution is carried on the platform.
Every input is the institution's own and every formula is shown. No industry averages and no vendor savings claim: the arithmetic is the argument.
The institution's figures
Illustrative starting points only. The model uses nothing beyond what is entered here.
Applied to execution cost only — team time, evidence assembly and delay. Exposure is never reduced by this model; it is shown as risk the institution carries.
The reading
Regulatory execution cost today
€2,119,500
each year, on the figures entered
Recovered at 60%
€1,121,700
each year
Layer B — first year
Not entered
the investment stated in the proposal
First-year net position
+€1,121,700
recovered less platform cost
Pays back in
—
the investment stated in the proposal is required for this reading
How the annual figure is built
6 people × €95,000 × 45% of their time
120 instruments × 6 h × €52.78/h
25 changes × 42 days × €1,500/day
€250,000 × 1 event(s) a year
Capital at risk, carried either way
€250,000 of exposure a year is shown here as risk carried by the institution. No software removes it; what changes is whether the institution can demonstrate, on the day it is tested, that every requirement held an owner, an action and its evidence.
Compared against Layer B — Control. The layer investment is the figure stated in the institution's own proposal; no amount is published on this page, and nothing here constitutes a quotation.
Engagement
Amounts stated in the proposal for the engagement
Request a briefing